Monday, December 27, 2010

Ulips | Regulatory changes

In India, minority are insured; out of which about 50% people buy insurance for the income-tax remission on insurance premiums in the annual tax statement and the exemption of maturity value of insurance policies from tax
Unit-linked insurance plans (Ulips) have gained enormous popularity in life insurance segment in the current decade. According to statistics, the total new business premium generated from Ulip sales for the year ended March 2009 was Rs447 billion, or 55% of total new business, as per reports of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Irda). This has grown to about Rs60, 000 crore in the latest year. Private life companies generate over 90% of their business from single and regular premium Ulips.
Irda has brought vast changes concerning Ulips since June’10 forcing life insurance companies to completely rework their Ulip strategies. Since September’10, Insurance companies have been required to re-launch their Ulips.
Reasons for regulatory changes
Three main reasons for application of several restrictions on Ulips:
1. Due to the tax benefits discussed above customers have bought Ulips as short-term investment without serious intention to continue the policy until the final maturity date.
According to Irda, the lapse rate on Ulips was 26% in FY06 (which continued to increase), and the 13-month persistency level of Ulips has significantly trailed the traditional plans. The low level of life cover embedded in Ulips and the ease of exit had contributed to an unhealthy growth in lapsation.
2. The regulator considered that the low persistency has been encouraged by the insurers because they gained from surrender charges, which have been as high as 70-90%. Thus the “profits” earned by shareholders from the surrender charges have fuelled aggressive distribution of Ulips, forming a vicious circle.
3. Ulip distributors have not made honest effort to develop a long-term relationship with customers or make a needs-based analysis of their insurance needs. This has not made customers recognize that insurance policy is an instrument of long-term protection and growth.
In August’09, the securities market regulator issued a directive requiring asset management companies not to deduct any distribution and other charges from the investment amount of customers on mutual fund schemes with a view to encouraging retail participation. This “no entry load structure” has led to a drastic reduction in the commission earning of mutual fund distributors, thus these agents promoted sale of Ulips which fetched attractive commission.

No comments:

Post a Comment